4/26/10
A good friend sent along an e-mail that is in wide circulation entitled
“WHAT A BEAUTIFUL WRITE UP ON CATHOLICS -Jewish Sam Miller on Catholics”
You’ve probably seen it. In general, it is a terrific e-mail, in which Mr. Miller points out all the good works that the Church does, citing specifically its efforts in education and health care. Mr. Miller does not mention, though he easily could have, the Church’s ongoing efforts among the poor.
The e-mail does cite at least one questionable statistic, to wit:
“ Meanwhile, 1.7% of the Catholic clergy has been found guilty of pedophilia. 10% of the Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia. This is not a Catholic Problem.”
Hmm…
Mr. Miller cites no source, but, even if we assume that the above statistic was not cut out of whole cloth, there are problems with it. Note the operative term is “found guilty.” If there indeed is such a disparity in the incidence of convictions for pedophilia between Protestant and Catholic clergy, much of it may arise because of the continual and apparently strident efforts of the Catholic Church hierarchy to cover up pedophilia among Catholic clergy. Thus, Mr. Miller’s e-mail may have the unintended effect of reinforcing the charges of cover-up being made against the Church hierarchy.
Further, even if the above statistic is true, the act of pedophilia is one crime, and one that does not seem to have been committed, except in very rare instances (e.g., Bishop Roger Vangheluwe of Bruges, Belgium, who admitted sexually abusing a boy in the ‘90s), by the Church hierarchy (for these purposes, bishops and above). But it is another, related crime, the cover-up of pedophilia, and the enabling of pedophilia by keeping pervert priests in positions in which they have access to children, that is the sin of the hierarchy. And even if only 1.7% of the Catholic clergy has been found guilty of pedophilia (a statistic with which I have little problem; what makes Mr. Miller’s citation unbelievable is its “10% of Protestant clergy” claim and what makes it irrelevant, at best, is the clever use of the terminology “found guilty”), a much larger percentage of the hierarchy is guilty of covering up and enabling the ghastly crime of pedophilia.
All that having been written, Mr. Miller has made some great points that need to be made and he has this Catholic’s gratitude. My response to my friend who sent me the e-mail is worth sharing with my readers, and so I have reproduced its essence below:
No one does more good for more people than the Catholic Church, which, as a church, is far more than its hierarchy. That the Church does so much good is only one of the reasons that it is worth protecting from the people who run it. That it is a divinely inspired institution is the reason that it will survive the incompetence, obtuseness, and, in some cases, misogynistic and misanthropic tendencies and actions of some in the hierarchy.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
the church doesn't do good work. People do the good work. If the catholic church suddenly disappeared in an act of divine retribution or was taken over in a LBO by the Lutherans or Presbyterians, the people would still do good work, and they wouldn't have to kneel as much. If Catholics are doing good work because the Church tells them to instead of because it is inherently the right thing to do, their motivation isn't very saintly and won't get them any indulgence points from the heavenly auditors.
4/27/10
Ah, but that’s my underlying point, the recurring theme in all my comments on the Church: The people, not the hierarchy, ARE the Church. So when the Catholic people do good works, the Church does good works.
On another note…
I hope the motivation is not “heavenly indulgence points;” I hope that the laity has advanced beyond that in the nearly 500 years since Luther gave us our badly needed wake up call, though I suspect a good measure of the hierarchy hasn’t. But, regardless of the motivation, since the people are the Church, when the people go good works, the Church does good works.
As always, thanks for reading and commenting. It is readers like you, and others who come up with such insightful comments, that make the Insightful Pontificator what it is.
Miller's wrong numbers...
The statement "10% of the Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia" has no basis in fact at all! Phew! We Protestant pastors may be bad. But we're not THAT bad!
In the original 2003 speech Mr. Miller cites a July/August 2002 Sojourners article by Rose Marie Berger in which she misinterprets statements from Penn. State Prof. Philip Jenkins regarding sexual abuse by Protestant ministers.
In the original article Berger writes...
"Philip Jenkins concludes in his book "Pedophiles and Priests" that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been found guilty of pedophilia (specifically of boys), 10 percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia." (This quote is used in Miller's speech)
To which Philip Jenkins responds (Sept/Oct 2002)...
"I regret to say that the statement is baloney. I never said it, and it's not true!... Every time this ten percent statement appears attributed to me, I try to debunk it, but these things have a life of their own. I have no idea what the actual proportion of pedophile protestant clergy is, but I would be amazed if it was more than a fraction of one percent."
Details here...
Sojourner Article... http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=magazine.article&issue=soj0207&article=020741d
Sojourners apologized to its readers for passing on erroneous information and revised the article, removing the incorrect and defamatory information. But not before Sam Miller got a hold of it!
Good for you for questioning the 10% figure. Thousands upon thousands of others have merely accepted it and passed it on. I has become an "Urban Legend" in the past month!
Rev. Rob Pollock
Vancouver, BC
CANADA
May 5, 2010 2:29 AM
Thanks, Rob, for clearing up that statistic; I knew it looked bogus.
Thanks for reading and commenting, and thanks for doing the Lord's work.
Post a Comment